Although many Mac users are content with Azurues (Vuze is a bloat, and Java is best not talked about) and Transmission (I don’t like this app, even though a lot of people swear by it), a lot of them have been patiently waiting for µTorrent to make its way to our favourite platform. It has had a strong fan following on the Windows platform and is generally regarded as one of the best torrent clients in existence. So when µTorrent developers talked about the Mac version back in June 2007, there was a lot of buzz. The project was then dropped due to a lack of active developers.

However, hope has been restored now as a leaked version of µTorrent makes its way through the very medium that it plans to rule. Marking its first public appearance, which happened a little earlier than expected, TorrentFreak reported the leak of the alpha version to The Pirate Bay, one of the largest public trackers in existence .

The official version should be out soon. You can even signup at the µTorrent site if you want to be notified as soon as it lands. As should be evident by the nature of its release, this is a very early and unstable version, which is why we’re burdening ourselves with the risk of taking it for a spin and testing it, just so that you don’t have to. [Ed note: Heck, who are we kidding—we love nothing more than messing with pre-release software!] Read on for the full review.

What plays well?

Even though it is a leaked pre-alpha release, it’s as functional as a torrent client should be:

  • Cocoa based (although it crashes if you hit ctrl-cmd-d, the keyboard shortcut for invoking the inline dictionary) and looks like most other well designed Mac applications. The only similarity to the interface of the Windows version is the basic structure;
  • Uses very little system resources, taking up less than 10MB for the most part;
  • Supports DHT and peer exchange for public tracker torrents;
  • Download scheduling (BSNL DataOne and MTNL TriBand users can sleep in peace);
  • Quick Look integration allows you to preview what’s in your torrent files; and
  • First time in the history of Mac applications, we have a crash feature! [Ed note: Yes, an actual, living, breathing feature that exists solely for the purpose of *crashing* the application!] Just hit File > Crash, and your client will go down the shoot! 
  • What doesn’t work?

    The application is buggy to its very core as of this writing and misses some basic features. Note, again, that this is a very early release and the developers are probably soon going to implement most of these features.

  • No selective file downloading;
  • Intel only, so it won’t work on PPC powered Macs;
  • Removing a torrent file while leeching will delete the downloaded data;
  • No list of peers (so you can’t ‘kick’ a peer);
  • Dock badges for upload/download rate don’t work as they should;
  • Not enough information (like amount of data discarded, pieces size and their progress, etc.);
  • Search feature is extremely buggy. Searching through 4-5 torrents causes it to crash (hey, if we wanted it to crash, we’d use the aforementioned feature!);
  • Can’t create torrents (though the icon is present);
  • Trying to customize the toolbar will crash the client; and
  • A lot of other minor bugs here and there.
  • Seeing is believing

    I also noticed a lack of small things which you would expect from your client. For example, torrent files can’t be dragged and dropped into it. It automatically starts resumes all download(s) when the client is relaunched even though I might have paused it before I quit the app.

    I don’t recommend that you use µTorrent, in its current state, as your default torrent client because it’s not stable, lacks basic features, and poses an assortment of other risks associated with running a pre-alpha release. Nevertheless, it’s a good “first” version of the client and can only get better in the future. If you don’t want to go by my recommendation, hear it from the big guy Simon Morris himself.

    BitTorrent’s VP of Product Management told TorrentFreak in a response to the leak: “Apparently an internal development build of uTorrent for Mac has been leaked publicly. It has been referred to as an “alpha” quality build. The unfortunate part is that we did not intentionally release this build and would strongly recommend folks not to use it as it isn’t yet complete or stable enough to be released to the public.”

    So, does this mean freedom from CrossOver at last? Well, not just yet, because I won’t be using it till some of the basic features I mentioned above are incorporated and functional. However, I’m happy to note that the best torrent client for Windows is being ported to the Mac. I can’t wait for the beta/final version to hit the streets and remove Azureus from my Mac for good.

    [Ed note: The views of Ashwin notwithstanding, it’s my (and Milind’s) personal recommendation that if you need a BitTorrent client, go with Transmission. It’s lightweight and works as advertised; it’s perfect. We don’t need no Java based crap (Azureus) or any pity from the Windows community (µTorrent). The latter may be the best client on the Windows platform but Transmission can kick it where it hurts any day of the week!]



    1. Ashwin on Tuesday 23, 2008

      Ed -
      I’ve tried and tested out Transmission. Somehow I didn’t like it. Vuze is a bloat, but v.2.5.0.4 [which version to use] plays fine. Also what’s the point in having a high end system if you expect all your apps to run within 30 MB? :P

      I personally would choose Azureus for the amount of features and control it offers. Anyway µTorrent (Win) pwns these both and waiting for a stable release for the Mac version.

    2. jake on Tuesday 23, 2008

      Wow! Great news man. Thankfully it looks better than the windows version. If they had ported that over, it would have definitely flopped (or be a flop I guess) because Transmission is any day better than Win-uTorrent.

    3. Scott on Tuesday 23, 2008

      I still think i will like transmission better….. ill have to take a look when it comes out…. but I like a lot of features of transmission like the ability to view and manage my transfers remotely on my iPhone.

    4. nowhereman on Tuesday 23, 2008

      @Scott-“…but I like a lot of features of transmission like the ability to view and manage my transfers remotely on my iPhone.”

      How do you manage your transfers with your iPhone?

    5. Milind Alvares on Tuesday 23, 2008

      @nowhereman: The new version of transmission supports the WebUI. So, once that is done you can just as well control your torrents from your iPhone Safari browser.

    6. Blauwbaard on Tuesday 23, 2008

      did any of you hear of Xtorrent ? It’s for Mac only and works fine and has enough features for the ‘common’ user and it’s lots easier than Azureus (too complicated and confusing interface). Moreover it looks really like any Mac-app should look like.

    7. Aayush Arya on Tuesday 23, 2008

      Yes, but there really is no need to pay for it when Transmission is better than it in almost every respect and is also free. Xtorrent has a shady backstory anyway. It’s widely believed that it’s just a copy of the Transmission code wrapped in a different GUI.

      I’ve purchased Acquisition and use it extensively because there is no alternative for it on Mac OS X (and I’m not going to use any Java application like LimeWire) but Transmission trumps Xtorrent, and all other torrent clients across all platforms, any day of the week. :)

    8. Milind Alvares on Tuesday 23, 2008

      @Blauwbaard: Xtorrent is first of all a paid app. Secondly, most private trackers have banned this client due to it not reporting proper data transfers. So Xtorrent is not something to be taken seriously. Seriously.

    9. lipsum on Tuesday 23, 2008

      @Blaubard: Xtorrent sucks man. Doesn’t work with BS or VtxNt.

      Tranmission is the best. The interface is perfect for saving desktop space unlike this extra wide uTorrent. I don’t see why I’m ever going to switch from Transmission to this windows crap. All things said though its nice to see people being serious about Macs. Two years ago all we had was Tomato Torrent!

    10. Constable Odo on Tuesday 23, 2008

      I swear by Transmission. It works like a charm and gives me all the control and information I require. Set it and forget it. I used to use Azureus (features galore, but unnecessary) an I’ve tested Vuze, but Transmission is just my speed. To quote Apple, “It just works.” :)

      I got started with Transmission because one of my favorite torrent sites (AvistaZ) disallowed Azureus for some reason saying it was causing problems. Once I switched to Transmission I never went back.

    11. nowhereman on Tuesday 23, 2008

      @Milind Alvares I tried to get my iPhone to hook up but it won’t. I’ve got a router with the firewall on…tried to open the port but no luck. It opens the web UI from the localhost no problem, but not remotely.

    12. Milind Alvares on Tuesday 23, 2008

      @Nowhereman: The clutch webui as it is right now is extremely buggy. The Transmission team themselves say that this is a very early project and that there’s tons of bugs. So sometimes it might just refuse to work for you.

      I will try and do some research on this and maybe post a guide to get it working. Till then, hang in there.

    13. RJ on Tuesday 23, 2008

      Transmission is more than enough. Better than uTorrent for Windows. And how anyone in their right mind can use Azureus is beyond me.

    14. jared on Tuesday 23, 2008

      Transmission is a class apart. There’s no way uTorrent or any other windows crap can take it over. The UI, the features, and how it fits right on a Mac desktop is just unbeatable. If uTorrent brings something new to the table, then I’m all for it. But if its the same windows crap, then please, no thank you.

    15. Azeem on Tuesday 23, 2008

      Liked uTorrent when I was on Windows days but it had the NAT problem. Later on FlashGet my fav DM on windows started bittorrenting, so I gave it a try and to my pleasant surprise Flashget overcame NAT problem without any tweaking. I used Flashget extensively on Windows and never gave up on it. And then a day came when I gave up on…… well, on Windows!! On Mac, there is nothing that comes close to Transmission, its smooth, looks cool, loaded with features and most importantly its very intelligent.

    16. nowhereman on Tuesday 23, 2008

      @Milind Alvares it may be that I’m just not opening the right port or am configuring the router incorrectly…

    17. Milind Alvares on Tuesday 23, 2008

      ^ Like I said, I’ll get to the bottom of this. Expect a post about this soon :)

    18. nowhereman on Tuesday 23, 2008

      no problem

    19. […] out my review (thanks Milind for adding more stuff and improving it) at Smoking Apples. The bottom line is it is buggy and missing basic some features. Not at all a bad for a […]

    20. Mehul Gohil on Tuesday 23, 2008

      nothing comes close to transmission. beats all other torrent softwares hollow.

    21. Fred on Tuesday 23, 2008

      It’s amazing how obsessed mac fans are with all things mac! “windows crap” - seriously, get a life!

      uTorrent is far better than Transmission and i can’t wait for the mac version.

    22. Milind Alvares on Tuesday 23, 2008

      @Fred: We are a snooty bunch I admit. But Transmission is truly the best torrent out there!

    23. Ashwin Ravindran on Tuesday 23, 2008

      “But Transmission is truly the best torrent out there!”
      Hehe. This is a fanboyish statement. Your judgement and not a fact. In reality µTorrent and Azurues pwns Transmission. :P

    24. Aayush Arya on Tuesday 23, 2008

      Yes, Ashwin, every other Mac user who commented in this thread is wrong and you’re right.

    25. nowhereman on Tuesday 23, 2008

      staying tuned (tic toc)….:)

    26. brian cometa on Tuesday 23, 2008

      if you don’t want to keep waiting for the mac version to be released, try using the stable and super fast window’s version on your mac via fusion… check out my setup guide at corewerkz.com: http://www.corewerkz.com/2008/10/10/fusion-xp-utorrent-fast-reliable-mac-torrent-downloads/

    27. nowhereman on Tuesday 23, 2008

      was referring to the iPhone managing transfers that Milind was going to look into

    28. Milind Alvares on Tuesday 23, 2008

      *Slaps himself in the face, repeatedly*

      Sorry bout the no show. Will get right on it.

    29. nowhereman on Tuesday 23, 2008

      :-)…np

    30. Andy Bewernick on Tuesday 23, 2008

      I personally love Transmission for it’s simplicity. The one looks like a fail for not having selective file downloading.

    31. […] I promised one of our commenters on the µTorrent for Mac post that I would get to the bottom of this. And with the release of Transmission 1.4, the WebUI […]

    32. […] posted a review when the pre-alpha was leaked, and just over two months later, the official beta is released! The Leopard-only Intel-only beta is […]

    33. […] Ontem à noite meu email recebeu a noticia de que o uTorrent for Mac finalmente chegou. Quer dizer, chegou e não chegou. A versão é 0.90 funciona apenas no OS X 10.5 e apenas na plataforma Intel. A versão é beta e parece que ainda tem bastante problemas. Quer dizer, os problemas são a falta de funções que a versão para Windows tem e a versão para Mac não tem. Por exemplo o RSS downloader não veio para o pomar. Abaixo uma tela capturada do TUAW. Aliás, você pode ler mais no TUAW. E se você quiser ler um ótimo artigo a respeito, veja o artigo no SmokinApple. […]

    34. […] happy to post a review of what this torrent client brings to the table. Over two months back we reviewed the leaked internal release of the world’s favourite BitTorrent app—µTorrent. It was buggy […]


    (No need to resubmit)