Comments on: Stainless Browser: A Crossover between Safari and Chrome

By: bopfive5

bopfive5 — Sun, 08 May 2011 14:12:37 +0000

take ur picture to my blog, thanks

By: Christian Kent

Christian Kent — Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:39:40 +0000

Stainless is the *only* option for PPC Mac users. If you want the benefits of tabs in separate processes, and the blazing speed (great for older Macs!) then you can’t have Chrome or Chromium. Not even Safari will provide this feature on PPC in version 5. You have to have Stainless.

By: Azeem

Azeem — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:00:22 +0000

But look at it, its just tiny. The zip file I downloaded is just 488Kb and the dmg it contains is just 508Kb. It loads fast and doesn’t clog the system, I think its worth a try

By: Milind Alvares

Milind Alvares — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:39:28 +0000

From a developers perspective, there are only three main browsers: Gecko, IE, and Webkit. All these browsers are based on these main engines which is a good thing.

I do think that Stainless is a pointless exercise though. With Chrome coming soon enough to the Mac, it will provide for most of Stainless’s functionality (although I’m happy with Safari).

By: Ashwin

Ashwin — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:20:34 +0000

I feel it’s better to have a lot of browsers competing for user base. It’s good for users. Features like in Chrome wouldn’t be known unless someone start to innovate.

By: Mehul

Mehul — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:54:07 +0000

Too many browsers are literally clogging the web. A browsers primary use is surfing, it should be fast and yep, secure. Still, i guess Safari and firefox are the best right now.

I believe its pointless becoming choosy about browsers(unless some really severe faults creep up).