<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there a better way to keep your Mac apps updated?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/macupdate-5-updater/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/macupdate-5-updater/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:01:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Grant</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/macupdate-5-updater/#comment-12944</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 05:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=12642#comment-12944</guid>
		<description>+1 AppFresh.  Been using it for 1-2 years.  Never crashed.  No buggy feeling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 AppFresh.  Been using it for 1-2 years.  Never crashed.  No buggy feeling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/macupdate-5-updater/#comment-11319</link>
		<dc:creator>V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 10:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=12642#comment-11319</guid>
		<description>AppFresh has not working very well for me at all since Snow Leopard. I haven&#039;t tried MU but I&#039;ve thought about it since the $20 a year comes with other benefits. I think, perhaps, discounts on their bundles—which are bad ass.

That said, I loved AppFresh for many a year; if it works for you, then I am jealous and congratulations. By the way: it is crashing on my MacBook Core 2 Duo 2.0GHz with 10.6.3.

Be Well,
V</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AppFresh has not working very well for me at all since Snow Leopard. I haven&#8217;t tried MU but I&#8217;ve thought about it since the $20 a year comes with other benefits. I think, perhaps, discounts on their bundles—which are bad ass.</p>
<p>That said, I loved AppFresh for many a year; if it works for you, then I am jealous and congratulations. By the way: it is crashing on my MacBook Core 2 Duo 2.0GHz with 10.6.3.</p>
<p>Be Well,<br />
V</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley Dichter</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/macupdate-5-updater/#comment-8201</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley Dichter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=12642#comment-8201</guid>
		<description>CNET TechTracker is free. While not buggy, it does flag up to date apps as not because of a variation in the version numbering from their database.  It does check for updates daily so that is a plus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNET TechTracker is free. While not buggy, it does flag up to date apps as not because of a variation in the version numbering from their database.  It does check for updates daily so that is a plus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/macupdate-5-updater/#comment-8198</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=12642#comment-8198</guid>
		<description>I use appfresh and it seems to get worse and worse, every scan finds 20-30 apps that need &quot;updating&quot; but after going thru them only 1-3 usually are correct all the others are up-to-date&gt; I have used it for years on 7 different machines and all the same results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use appfresh and it seems to get worse and worse, every scan finds 20-30 apps that need &#8220;updating&#8221; but after going thru them only 1-3 usually are correct all the others are up-to-date&gt; I have used it for years on 7 different machines and all the same results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milind Alvares</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/macupdate-5-updater/#comment-8194</link>
		<dc:creator>Milind Alvares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=12642#comment-8194</guid>
		<description>Oh come on Tom! Why would you go and accuse me of being in cahoots with some company I&#039;ve written about? It&#039;s a terrible to hear (although I suppose it feels good to say). In fact I think MacUpdate is sleazy for redirecting a search for AppFresh to its MacUpdate desktop page.

Reason I mentioned AppFresh developers aren&#039;t proud of their app, is because of this distinct warning on the AppFresh page:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Careful, Though&lt;/strong&gt;
Please note: AppFresh is still work in progress and released as a Development Preview. We cannot assure that AppFresh is working correctly on every setup. Although installing applications using AppFresh has been heavily tested, please make sure to have a working backup.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That kind of a warning doesn&#039;t exactly brew a lot of confidence if you ask me. That said, I&#039;m sure it works for the vast majority—it&#039;s always the vocal minority complaining on the web. I still can&#039;t blame myself really. It crashed twice on me, so I checked for reviews, then I checked the app site and saw the big warning. Didn&#039;t feel like recommending such a product. Perhaps I should do some more testing to see what&#039;s the deal with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on Tom! Why would you go and accuse me of being in cahoots with some company I&#8217;ve written about? It&#8217;s a terrible to hear (although I suppose it feels good to say). In fact I think MacUpdate is sleazy for redirecting a search for AppFresh to its MacUpdate desktop page.</p>
<p>Reason I mentioned AppFresh developers aren&#8217;t proud of their app, is because of this distinct warning on the AppFresh page:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Careful, Though</strong><br />
Please note: AppFresh is still work in progress and released as a Development Preview. We cannot assure that AppFresh is working correctly on every setup. Although installing applications using AppFresh has been heavily tested, please make sure to have a working backup.</p></blockquote>
<p>That kind of a warning doesn&#8217;t exactly brew a lot of confidence if you ask me. That said, I&#8217;m sure it works for the vast majority—it&#8217;s always the vocal minority complaining on the web. I still can&#8217;t blame myself really. It crashed twice on me, so I checked for reviews, then I checked the app site and saw the big warning. Didn&#8217;t feel like recommending such a product. Perhaps I should do some more testing to see what&#8217;s the deal with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Der Golem</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/macupdate-5-updater/#comment-8193</link>
		<dc:creator>Der Golem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=12642#comment-8193</guid>
		<description>+1 for Appfresh with a caveat.  Occasionally, it will not remember that an app has been updated, or list it twice. Because it accesses iusethis, it will not recognize updates for more obscure software.

It&#039;s updated regularly, works really well on my Leopard systems (I&#039;m not using Snow Leopard).  I run it once a month, after backing up my system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 for Appfresh with a caveat.  Occasionally, it will not remember that an app has been updated, or list it twice. Because it accesses iusethis, it will not recognize updates for more obscure software.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s updated regularly, works really well on my Leopard systems (I&#8217;m not using Snow Leopard).  I run it once a month, after backing up my system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/15 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: smokingapples.com @ 2012-02-11 15:12:10 -->
