Is there a better way to keep your Mac apps updated?

by Milind Alvares on November 2, 2009

Post image for Is there a better way to keep your Mac apps updated?

macupdate-main

After seeing what’s possible with an app management platform a.k.a., the App Store, on the iPhone, suddenly the whole Mac way of self managing your apps seems a little obsolete. You have to find em, install them, update them. Wouldn’t it be so easy just to click a button and have the app launch in your Dock? While there’s still no such thing as the Mac App Store, third party developers have made some headway in smoothening out the workflow. You can discover apps using Bodega. Install them using Hazel or Dropzone. And update them using a bunch of update trackers, one of them being MacUpdate.

macupdate-desktop-review

With its latest 5.0 release, MacUpdate wants to rekindle interest in the desktop app updating service it has offered for a while now. The new app “rewritten from the ground up” is much better to look at, and feels more at home on the Snow Leopard desktop. I don’t remember my experiences with the previous versions, but the new one claims smarter scanning, better workflow, and cheaper at $20/year for 5 Macs. You can of course, sign up for a ten day trial of the service.

So I put it through the test. I’ve got about 150 apps installed on my Mac, and MacUpdate went through them within 5 minutes of launch. An easy to understand list of what’s outdated, along with the version number changes is brought up. The list included widgets, screen savers, and preference panes along with the app in the Applications folder. Click on the app to see the release notes in the HUD, and click “Download + Install” to get the app updated. MU desktop does all the work behind the scenes, and presents you with an updated app. Seamless, effortless, painless. There’s even an “Update All” button if you’re up for mass updating.

MacUpdate does offer app discovery as well. Under the “Mac Community” section in the sidebar, you can access MUpromo apps, latest releases, hot picks, and popular. The lists aren’t extensive, are incomplete, but for what it’s worth, installing new apps from there is just as easy and updating apps. Maybe MacUpdate could also add a search and effectively launch a 30,000 app strong “Mac App Store” of its own.

All this is fine while the app is free, but pay $20/year for keeping your apps up to date? Almost every Mac app comes with some sort of built-in update checker—the Sparkle framework usually—and it pings the update server every time the app is launched. So unless you’re not using the app in question, it’s going to be updated. The only reason the MU desktop app found a bunch of apps on my Mac that were up for updating only because I don’t usually update my apps unnecessarily. I have a slow internet connection, and it’s better used to download podcasts instead of pulling unnecessary point updates.

sparkle-updater
Is this not good enough?

This brings me to other apps that offer updating. Bodega also has its own update checker, and although their 700 app strong database isn’t as extensive as MacUpdate’s. There’s even a simple Dashboard widget that checks the Apple software directory, MU, as well as VersionTracker. Even VersionTracker has its own app/service. So far MacUpdate is the best of the lot, with an extensive database, clean user interface, and smooth workflow. Bodega of course is meant more for discovery than for updating, so it’s apples and oranges here.

What’s my take? Unless you’re a clean freak, and need to have every app up-to-date on launch, having one of these apps or services isn’t exactly game changing. While $20/year isn’t all that much, it’s still an unnecessary expense. Moreover, you need to launch the MacUpdate app to carry out this updating in any case. But that’s only my limited point of view. Anyone using one of these regularly?

Reader Comments

Charles-Henry Vespierre November 2, 2009 at 9:05 pm vespierre.com

Why any words about appfresh ? Nice app combined with iusethis.com. And it’s free.

   

Marin November 2, 2009 at 9:16 pm blog.underplot.com

Yes I want to mention as well AppFresh, works great, finds all apps (it takes a bit of time, but it really doesn’t miss any) and updating is usually taking 1 or 2 clicks.

http://metaquark.de/appfresh/

Free and uses iusethis database

Marin

   

Owen November 2, 2009 at 9:30 pm

LogicielMacUpdate is worth checking out. It sits in the menubar, updates and installs apps automatically.

   

Tom November 2, 2009 at 9:37 pm tom-goetz.org

+1 for AppFresh. It uses iusethis.com which has a large app DB and is free. Why pay for something that is no better than a free competitor?

   

Milind November 2, 2009 at 9:58 pm soggysh.it

AppFresh is good? It crashed on me, and I saw several comments across the web highlighting its buggyness. Even the developers aren’t too proud of their app.

I guess it works then.

   

Tom November 2, 2009 at 10:14 pm tom-goetz.org

I’ve ben using AppFresh for more than a year and it has never given me any issues. What makes you think the developers aren’t proud of their app?

Do you have a relationship with MacUpdate?

   

Milind Alvares November 3, 2009 at 3:26 am soggysh.it

Oh come on Tom! Why would you go and accuse me of being in cahoots with some company I’ve written about? It’s a terrible to hear (although I suppose it feels good to say). In fact I think MacUpdate is sleazy for redirecting a search for AppFresh to its MacUpdate desktop page.

Reason I mentioned AppFresh developers aren’t proud of their app, is because of this distinct warning on the AppFresh page:

Careful, Though
Please note: AppFresh is still work in progress and released as a Development Preview. We cannot assure that AppFresh is working correctly on every setup. Although installing applications using AppFresh has been heavily tested, please make sure to have a working backup.

That kind of a warning doesn’t exactly brew a lot of confidence if you ask me. That said, I’m sure it works for the vast majority—it’s always the vocal minority complaining on the web. I still can’t blame myself really. It crashed twice on me, so I checked for reviews, then I checked the app site and saw the big warning. Didn’t feel like recommending such a product. Perhaps I should do some more testing to see what’s the deal with that.

Charles-Henry Vespierre November 2, 2009 at 10:24 pm vespierre.com

Never met a problem with Appfresh on my Snow Leopard Imac 20”.

   

Federico Viticci November 2, 2009 at 10:50 pm macstories.net

I agree with Milind, AppFresh is buggy and outdated, although people claim it works fine on Snow Leopard.

Now, I don’t know is this MU5 is good or not, but I don’t need to keep everything - everytime up to date.

Nice post, btw.

   

Andi November 3, 2009 at 2:25 am andisblog.de

I’m also using the great AppFresh. Works perfectly fine and keeps my apps up to date – for free!

   

Der Golem November 3, 2009 at 3:07 am

+1 for Appfresh with a caveat. Occasionally, it will not remember that an app has been updated, or list it twice. Because it accesses iusethis, it will not recognize updates for more obscure software.

It’s updated regularly, works really well on my Leopard systems (I’m not using Snow Leopard). I run it once a month, after backing up my system.

   

dave November 3, 2009 at 5:26 am

I use appfresh and it seems to get worse and worse, every scan finds 20-30 apps that need “updating” but after going thru them only 1-3 usually are correct all the others are up-to-date> I have used it for years on 7 different machines and all the same results.

   

Bradley Dichter November 3, 2009 at 6:48 pm

CNET TechTracker is free. While not buggy, it does flag up to date apps as not because of a variation in the version numbering from their database. It does check for updates daily so that is a plus.

   

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: