<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GTD on your Mac Part 1: Things and The Hit List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:01:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: samu</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/#comment-9680</link>
		<dc:creator>samu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=8929#comment-9680</guid>
		<description>&quot;With regards to the ‘Areas of responsibility’, I believe that maps to the GTD concept of a context …&quot;

I disagree (see above). 

Areas are exclusive; a task or project can belong to only one, while it could have several contexts. Moreover, a Project and all its tasks will belong to the same Area, while these tasks would more than likely have different contexts. Areas are like folders for tasks and projects; contexts are like tags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With regards to the ‘Areas of responsibility’, I believe that maps to the GTD concept of a context …&#8221;</p>
<p>I disagree (see above). </p>
<p>Areas are exclusive; a task or project can belong to only one, while it could have several contexts. Moreover, a Project and all its tasks will belong to the same Area, while these tasks would more than likely have different contexts. Areas are like folders for tasks and projects; contexts are like tags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/#comment-9663</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=8929#comment-9663</guid>
		<description>Great review! I&#039;ve currently got both of these installed on my system, and leaning towards THL based on the keyboard driven navigation and task entry.

One thing I think you didn&#039;t mention was they both have iCal integration.

The iPhone app for THL appears to be underway; they&#039;ve been making promises and releasing screenshots so it is definitely progressing.

With regards to the &#039;Areas of responsibility&#039;, I believe that maps to the GTD concept of a context, which THL provides (include @Home in the task description and it is added to the &#039;Home&#039; context - hit command-4 to see them all in the left hand menu)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review! I&#8217;ve currently got both of these installed on my system, and leaning towards THL based on the keyboard driven navigation and task entry.</p>
<p>One thing I think you didn&#8217;t mention was they both have iCal integration.</p>
<p>The iPhone app for THL appears to be underway; they&#8217;ve been making promises and releasing screenshots so it is definitely progressing.</p>
<p>With regards to the &#8216;Areas of responsibility&#8217;, I believe that maps to the GTD concept of a context, which THL provides (include @Home in the task description and it is added to the &#8216;Home&#8217; context &#8211; hit command-4 to see them all in the left hand menu)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew L</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/#comment-6792</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=8929#comment-6792</guid>
		<description>my personal favourite is Things. I does EVERYTHING so well! Then sync with the ipod, both have angel-beautiful interfaces, huge feature sets, easy to use and powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my personal favourite is Things. I does EVERYTHING so well! Then sync with the ipod, both have angel-beautiful interfaces, huge feature sets, easy to use and powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/#comment-5916</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=8929#comment-5916</guid>
		<description>Thanks @Shishir! I already have OF &amp; was looking a good Things vs. OmniFocus review, because I need to get loads done and I don&#039;t think I can add the learning curve for OF to the mix just now. 

Will give THL a whirl till evening, since it&#039;s in Beta anywayz.. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks @Shishir! I already have OF &amp; was looking a good Things vs. OmniFocus review, because I need to get loads done and I don&#8217;t think I can add the learning curve for OF to the mix just now. </p>
<p>Will give THL a whirl till evening, since it&#8217;s in Beta anywayz.. <img src='http://smokingapples.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pepa</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/#comment-5751</link>
		<dc:creator>Pepa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=8929#comment-5751</guid>
		<description>Both great apps. You can display to-dos from both of them directly on your desktop using GeekTool. See my tutorials: http://www.josefrichter.com/blog/dynamic-gtd-wallpaper-with-things-to-dos/ and http://www.josefrichter.com/blog/one-more-wallpaper-with-the-hit-list-to-dos/

Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both great apps. You can display to-dos from both of them directly on your desktop using GeekTool. See my tutorials: <a href="http://www.josefrichter.com/blog/dynamic-gtd-wallpaper-with-things-to-dos/" rel="nofollow">http://www.josefrichter.com/blog/dynamic-gtd-wallpaper-with-things-to-dos/</a> and <a href="http://www.josefrichter.com/blog/one-more-wallpaper-with-the-hit-list-to-dos/" rel="nofollow">http://www.josefrichter.com/blog/one-more-wallpaper-with-the-hit-list-to-dos/</a></p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shishir</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/#comment-5743</link>
		<dc:creator>Shishir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=8929#comment-5743</guid>
		<description>This is probably the 10th Things Vs THL review that I have read, but I still think that reviewers tend to miss pointing out all the big plusses, minuses of the apps.

For me:

Things:
+ Nice and clean UI
+ Tags are well implemented
- Not grouping of tasks / projects =&gt; Using it for more than a few projects is clumsy.
- Keyboard navigation is not well supported.
- Not very intuitive at the deeper levels. Eg. you can schedule repeating tasks in projects. 
- Syncing is clumsy at best.

THL:
+ Clean UI
+ Fully navigable using keyboard
+ Very flexible in terms of nested tasks, tags, contexts, folders etc.
- No iphone app.
- Cant complete projects (what&#039;s this about?)

OF:
+ Very rich feature set. 
+ Extremely customizable - from looks to views.
+ Sync very well implemented.
+ Great iphone app.
+ Best in terms of being able to get items in - clipping service, mail etc.
+ Most complete and polished
- UI a bit dated.
- No tags / multiple contexts per task. 
- Higher learning curve

After bouncing off all these apps, I am sticking to OF and it seems to be paying off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably the 10th Things Vs THL review that I have read, but I still think that reviewers tend to miss pointing out all the big plusses, minuses of the apps.</p>
<p>For me:</p>
<p>Things:<br />
+ Nice and clean UI<br />
+ Tags are well implemented<br />
- Not grouping of tasks / projects =&gt; Using it for more than a few projects is clumsy.<br />
- Keyboard navigation is not well supported.<br />
- Not very intuitive at the deeper levels. Eg. you can schedule repeating tasks in projects.<br />
- Syncing is clumsy at best.</p>
<p>THL:<br />
+ Clean UI<br />
+ Fully navigable using keyboard<br />
+ Very flexible in terms of nested tasks, tags, contexts, folders etc.<br />
- No iphone app.<br />
- Cant complete projects (what&#8217;s this about?)</p>
<p>OF:<br />
+ Very rich feature set.<br />
+ Extremely customizable &#8211; from looks to views.<br />
+ Sync very well implemented.<br />
+ Great iphone app.<br />
+ Best in terms of being able to get items in &#8211; clipping service, mail etc.<br />
+ Most complete and polished<br />
- UI a bit dated.<br />
- No tags / multiple contexts per task.<br />
- Higher learning curve</p>
<p>After bouncing off all these apps, I am sticking to OF and it seems to be paying off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/15 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: smokingapples.com @ 2012-02-12 00:17:57 -->
