<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GTD on your Mac Part 1: Things and The Hit List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 05:12:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: samu</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/#comment-9680</link>
		<dc:creator>samu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=8929#comment-9680</guid>
		<description>&quot;With regards to the ‘Areas of responsibility’, I believe that maps to the GTD concept of a context …&quot;

I disagree (see above). 

Areas are exclusive; a task or project can belong to only one, while it could have several contexts. Moreover, a Project and all its tasks will belong to the same Area, while these tasks would more than likely have different contexts. Areas are like folders for tasks and projects; contexts are like tags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With regards to the ‘Areas of responsibility’, I believe that maps to the GTD concept of a context …&#8221;</p>
<p>I disagree (see above). </p>
<p>Areas are exclusive; a task or project can belong to only one, while it could have several contexts. Moreover, a Project and all its tasks will belong to the same Area, while these tasks would more than likely have different contexts. Areas are like folders for tasks and projects; contexts are like tags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/#comment-9663</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=8929#comment-9663</guid>
		<description>Great review! I&#039;ve currently got both of these installed on my system, and leaning towards THL based on the keyboard driven navigation and task entry.

One thing I think you didn&#039;t mention was they both have iCal integration.

The iPhone app for THL appears to be underway; they&#039;ve been making promises and releasing screenshots so it is definitely progressing.

With regards to the &#039;Areas of responsibility&#039;, I believe that maps to the GTD concept of a context, which THL provides (include @Home in the task description and it is added to the &#039;Home&#039; context - hit command-4 to see them all in the left hand menu)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review! I&#8217;ve currently got both of these installed on my system, and leaning towards THL based on the keyboard driven navigation and task entry.</p>
<p>One thing I think you didn&#8217;t mention was they both have iCal integration.</p>
<p>The iPhone app for THL appears to be underway; they&#8217;ve been making promises and releasing screenshots so it is definitely progressing.</p>
<p>With regards to the &#8216;Areas of responsibility&#8217;, I believe that maps to the GTD concept of a context, which THL provides (include @Home in the task description and it is added to the &#8216;Home&#8217; context &#8211; hit command-4 to see them all in the left hand menu)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew L</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/#comment-6792</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=8929#comment-6792</guid>
		<description>my personal favourite is Things. I does EVERYTHING so well! Then sync with the ipod, both have angel-beautiful interfaces, huge feature sets, easy to use and powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my personal favourite is Things. I does EVERYTHING so well! Then sync with the ipod, both have angel-beautiful interfaces, huge feature sets, easy to use and powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/#comment-5916</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=8929#comment-5916</guid>
		<description>Thanks @Shishir! I already have OF &amp; was looking a good Things vs. OmniFocus review, because I need to get loads done and I don&#039;t think I can add the learning curve for OF to the mix just now. 

Will give THL a whirl till evening, since it&#039;s in Beta anywayz.. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks @Shishir! I already have OF &amp; was looking a good Things vs. OmniFocus review, because I need to get loads done and I don&#8217;t think I can add the learning curve for OF to the mix just now. </p>
<p>Will give THL a whirl till evening, since it&#8217;s in Beta anywayz.. <img src='http://smokingapples.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shishir</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/#comment-5743</link>
		<dc:creator>Shishir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=8929#comment-5743</guid>
		<description>This is probably the 10th Things Vs THL review that I have read, but I still think that reviewers tend to miss pointing out all the big plusses, minuses of the apps.

For me:

Things:
+ Nice and clean UI
+ Tags are well implemented
- Not grouping of tasks / projects =&gt; Using it for more than a few projects is clumsy.
- Keyboard navigation is not well supported.
- Not very intuitive at the deeper levels. Eg. you can schedule repeating tasks in projects. 
- Syncing is clumsy at best.

THL:
+ Clean UI
+ Fully navigable using keyboard
+ Very flexible in terms of nested tasks, tags, contexts, folders etc.
- No iphone app.
- Cant complete projects (what&#039;s this about?)

OF:
+ Very rich feature set. 
+ Extremely customizable - from looks to views.
+ Sync very well implemented.
+ Great iphone app.
+ Best in terms of being able to get items in - clipping service, mail etc.
+ Most complete and polished
- UI a bit dated.
- No tags / multiple contexts per task. 
- Higher learning curve

After bouncing off all these apps, I am sticking to OF and it seems to be paying off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably the 10th Things Vs THL review that I have read, but I still think that reviewers tend to miss pointing out all the big plusses, minuses of the apps.</p>
<p>For me:</p>
<p>Things:<br />
+ Nice and clean UI<br />
+ Tags are well implemented<br />
- Not grouping of tasks / projects =&gt; Using it for more than a few projects is clumsy.<br />
- Keyboard navigation is not well supported.<br />
- Not very intuitive at the deeper levels. Eg. you can schedule repeating tasks in projects.<br />
- Syncing is clumsy at best.</p>
<p>THL:<br />
+ Clean UI<br />
+ Fully navigable using keyboard<br />
+ Very flexible in terms of nested tasks, tags, contexts, folders etc.<br />
- No iphone app.<br />
- Cant complete projects (what&#8217;s this about?)</p>
<p>OF:<br />
+ Very rich feature set.<br />
+ Extremely customizable &#8211; from looks to views.<br />
+ Sync very well implemented.<br />
+ Great iphone app.<br />
+ Best in terms of being able to get items in &#8211; clipping service, mail etc.<br />
+ Most complete and polished<br />
- UI a bit dated.<br />
- No tags / multiple contexts per task.<br />
- Higher learning curve</p>
<p>After bouncing off all these apps, I am sticking to OF and it seems to be paying off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samu</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/gtd-on-your-mac-part-1-things-and-the-hit-list/#comment-5741</link>
		<dc:creator>samu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=8929#comment-5741</guid>
		<description>A great tool for anyone established on Things but interested in The Hit List is the Things Migrator: 

http://ctrloptcmd.com/archives/847/migrate-from-things-to-the-hit-list/

This effortlessly duplicates your existing tasks and projects in THL, which cuts down a lot of the resistance to adoption. I&#039;m still leaning towards Things for now, however; a task manager is simply no use to me without a mobile app.

@wowo_steve

   &#039;“area” in Things was just a imitation of “context”&#039;

Not really. Page 52: &quot;20,000 Feet: Areas of Responsibility. You create or accept most of 
your projects because of your responsibilities, which for most 
people can be defined in ten to fifteen categories. These are the 
key areas within which you want to achieve results and maintain 
standards. Your job may entail at least implicit commitments 
for things like strategic planning, administrative support, staff 
development, market research, customer service, or asset manage- 
ment. And your personal life has an equal number of such focus 
arenas: health, family, finances, home environment, spirituality, 
recreation, etc. Listing and reviewing these responsibilities gives a 
more comprehensive framework for evaluating your inventory of 
projects.&quot;  

i.e., Areas are broader themes within which individual projects are grouped, rather than @phone, @mac attributes given to individual tasks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great tool for anyone established on Things but interested in The Hit List is the Things Migrator: </p>
<p><a href="http://ctrloptcmd.com/archives/847/migrate-from-things-to-the-hit-list/" rel="nofollow">http://ctrloptcmd.com/archives/847/migrate-from-things-to-the-hit-list/</a></p>
<p>This effortlessly duplicates your existing tasks and projects in THL, which cuts down a lot of the resistance to adoption. I&#8217;m still leaning towards Things for now, however; a task manager is simply no use to me without a mobile app.</p>
<p>@wowo_steve</p>
<p>   &#8216;“area” in Things was just a imitation of “context”&#8217;</p>
<p>Not really. Page 52: &#8220;20,000 Feet: Areas of Responsibility. You create or accept most of<br />
your projects because of your responsibilities, which for most<br />
people can be defined in ten to fifteen categories. These are the<br />
key areas within which you want to achieve results and maintain<br />
standards. Your job may entail at least implicit commitments<br />
for things like strategic planning, administrative support, staff<br />
development, market research, customer service, or asset manage-<br />
ment. And your personal life has an equal number of such focus<br />
arenas: health, family, finances, home environment, spirituality,<br />
recreation, etc. Listing and reviewing these responsibilities gives a<br />
more comprehensive framework for evaluating your inventory of<br />
projects.&#8221;  </p>
<p>i.e., Areas are broader themes within which individual projects are grouped, rather than @phone, @mac attributes given to individual tasks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/16 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: smokingapples.com @ 2012-05-24 00:27:42 -->
