<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clearing Duplicates with Decloner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/clearing-duplicates-with-decloner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/clearing-duplicates-with-decloner/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:01:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/clearing-duplicates-with-decloner/#comment-13998</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 20:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=9227#comment-13998</guid>
		<description>I found decloner to be an excellent app to find duplicate files. I was very patient in checking all duplicates found because I had a disk drive crash and I was inspecting the recovered files which had lost their filenames against some that had been recovered intact. It was very messy. It did take about twelve hours to find the duplicates in a 1TB drive recovery operation, but if you&#039;ve ever copied or back up a 1TB you will realize that is not a long period of time when doing low level file operations. If the program was just doing a superficial name comparison check I am sure it could be done much faster. The program is really checking file contents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found decloner to be an excellent app to find duplicate files. I was very patient in checking all duplicates found because I had a disk drive crash and I was inspecting the recovered files which had lost their filenames against some that had been recovered intact. It was very messy. It did take about twelve hours to find the duplicates in a 1TB drive recovery operation, but if you&#8217;ve ever copied or back up a 1TB you will realize that is not a long period of time when doing low level file operations. If the program was just doing a superficial name comparison check I am sure it could be done much faster. The program is really checking file contents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zxspectrum</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/clearing-duplicates-with-decloner/#comment-5896</link>
		<dc:creator>zxspectrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=9227#comment-5896</guid>
		<description>So after a day with Decloner i have to say that it’s just a useless app (at least at this point). It took Decloner 14 Hours!!! to scan a 1TB Folder. Result where 50% wrong and the user interface is very “primitive” and time consuming. 

In comparison, Tidy Up! scanned the same folder in in less than 3 minutes! Also, you got so many options/ways to search by. Tidy Up! is not perfect, but it’s beyond Decloner. 

*You guys should really do a breakdown between - Decloner, File Buddy,  Araxis Find Duplicate Files and Tidy Up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So after a day with Decloner i have to say that it’s just a useless app (at least at this point). It took Decloner 14 Hours!!! to scan a 1TB Folder. Result where 50% wrong and the user interface is very “primitive” and time consuming. </p>
<p>In comparison, Tidy Up! scanned the same folder in in less than 3 minutes! Also, you got so many options/ways to search by. Tidy Up! is not perfect, but it’s beyond Decloner. </p>
<p>*You guys should really do a breakdown between &#8211; Decloner, File Buddy,  Araxis Find Duplicate Files and Tidy Up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/clearing-duplicates-with-decloner/#comment-5894</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=9227#comment-5894</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the recommendation, was looking for something like this. I&#039;ve been using baseline for tracking down space hoggers but this will get me those smaller files as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the recommendation, was looking for something like this. I&#8217;ve been using baseline for tracking down space hoggers but this will get me those smaller files as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zxspectrum</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/clearing-duplicates-with-decloner/#comment-5892</link>
		<dc:creator>zxspectrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=9227#comment-5892</guid>
		<description>&#039;Tidy Up!&#039; is better and Araxis&#039;s &#039;Find Duplicate Files&#039; is the most precise (although it&#039;s user interface is horrible).

Anyway, there is no perfect mac duplicates app...so this is a welcome addition. Hopefully the developer will take Decloner to the next level. 

thanks.

Btw - Chris, which Theme are you usinc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Tidy Up!&#8217; is better and Araxis&#8217;s &#8216;Find Duplicate Files&#8217; is the most precise (although it&#8217;s user interface is horrible).</p>
<p>Anyway, there is no perfect mac duplicates app&#8230;so this is a welcome addition. Hopefully the developer will take Decloner to the next level. </p>
<p>thanks.</p>
<p>Btw &#8211; Chris, which Theme are you usinc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Anderson</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/software/reviews/clearing-duplicates-with-decloner/#comment-5891</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=9227#comment-5891</guid>
		<description>Excellent! This is precisely what I was looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent! This is precisely what I was looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/15 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: smokingapples.com @ 2012-02-11 21:36:45 -->
