<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple recommends an Antivirus. So what?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smokingapples.com/news/apple-recommends-an-antivirus-so-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smokingapples.com/news/apple-recommends-an-antivirus-so-what/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:01:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/news/apple-recommends-an-antivirus-so-what/#comment-2306</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=3634#comment-2306</guid>
		<description>This is the only site I&#039;ve seen that has sensibly carried the antivirus page issue. Way to go smoking apples. 

And until a virus installs all on its own on my mac, I won&#039;t be bothering with an antivirus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the only site I&#8217;ve seen that has sensibly carried the antivirus page issue. Way to go smoking apples. </p>
<p>And until a virus installs all on its own on my mac, I won&#8217;t be bothering with an antivirus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Partners in Grime</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/news/apple-recommends-an-antivirus-so-what/#comment-2287</link>
		<dc:creator>Partners in Grime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=3634#comment-2287</guid>
		<description>I love the smell of napalm in the morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the smell of napalm in the morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brotherStefan</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/news/apple-recommends-an-antivirus-so-what/#comment-2275</link>
		<dc:creator>brotherStefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=3634#comment-2275</guid>
		<description>I just love it when I&#039;m reminded that Macs aren&#039;t immune to virus infection.  Now, I&#039;m unaware of any anti-virus app that is able to protect me from a virus that hasn&#039;t yet been written.  The apps than I can buy (make that, subscribe to) will protect my Mac from 140,000 existing virus variations (variations that affect PCs, not Macs).  Even with that protection, it won&#039;t protect me if I am unlucky enough to be among the first targets of that OOTB (Out of the Blue) virus that everybody &quot;knows&quot; is coming.  I mean, the virus has to be detected before an anti-virus definition can be written, doesn&#039;t it?  In order for it to be detected, it has to infect some hapless target, and those initial targets would be just as hapless whether or not they had the protection of the previous 10 year&#039;s worth of virus definitions.  Malware writers don&#039;t write malware to be detected by existing anti-virus software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just love it when I&#8217;m reminded that Macs aren&#8217;t immune to virus infection.  Now, I&#8217;m unaware of any anti-virus app that is able to protect me from a virus that hasn&#8217;t yet been written.  The apps than I can buy (make that, subscribe to) will protect my Mac from 140,000 existing virus variations (variations that affect PCs, not Macs).  Even with that protection, it won&#8217;t protect me if I am unlucky enough to be among the first targets of that OOTB (Out of the Blue) virus that everybody &#8220;knows&#8221; is coming.  I mean, the virus has to be detected before an anti-virus definition can be written, doesn&#8217;t it?  In order for it to be detected, it has to infect some hapless target, and those initial targets would be just as hapless whether or not they had the protection of the previous 10 year&#8217;s worth of virus definitions.  Malware writers don&#8217;t write malware to be detected by existing anti-virus software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/news/apple-recommends-an-antivirus-so-what/#comment-2270</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=3634#comment-2270</guid>
		<description>My head has been spinning looking at nut job sites (even big ones like AI) making a huge deal out of this. That page is obviously kept for legal reasons and everyone assumes it is Apple forcing antivirus software on users. I mean, haven&#039;t you seen a KB article before? They always have a &#039;use this advice if you like&#039; kind of atmosphere about them. I have an &quot;Apple&quot; search going on in TweetDeck. Oh my. 50% of the tweets were about this crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My head has been spinning looking at nut job sites (even big ones like AI) making a huge deal out of this. That page is obviously kept for legal reasons and everyone assumes it is Apple forcing antivirus software on users. I mean, haven&#8217;t you seen a KB article before? They always have a &#8216;use this advice if you like&#8217; kind of atmosphere about them. I have an &#8220;Apple&#8221; search going on in TweetDeck. Oh my. 50% of the tweets were about this crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milind Alvares</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/news/apple-recommends-an-antivirus-so-what/#comment-2269</link>
		<dc:creator>Milind Alvares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=3634#comment-2269</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tech sites like this should know better.&quot;

I hope you read the post, cause we&#039;re pretty much with you on this :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tech sites like this should know better.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope you read the post, cause we&#8217;re pretty much with you on this <img src='http://smokingapples.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnO</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/news/apple-recommends-an-antivirus-so-what/#comment-2268</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=3634#comment-2268</guid>
		<description>I am both an ISP and a reseller and the ONLY AV we have on any machines is on our mail servers as that it the only contact we have with Windows. Not any of the numerous other Macs in our organization have it as AV is a conflict from moment one.

I will remind those who say Macs aren&#039;t immune that the challenge has been out there for a number of years and the only alleged virus reports we get is from those selling AV, like the Gawd-awful &quot;the sky is falling&quot; Intego, and Symantec, none of whose products aren&#039;t allowed near our Macs.

Might it happen? Certainly. But AV wouldn&#039;t stop it as AV is always AFTER the fact. It is always behind AV writers and never anticipates. It can only fix or protect from already KNOWN virusses.

So you might as well wait until a virus shows up. So far, that is a very good approach.

Apple is just covering its legal butt. 
Tech sites like this should know better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am both an ISP and a reseller and the ONLY AV we have on any machines is on our mail servers as that it the only contact we have with Windows. Not any of the numerous other Macs in our organization have it as AV is a conflict from moment one.</p>
<p>I will remind those who say Macs aren&#8217;t immune that the challenge has been out there for a number of years and the only alleged virus reports we get is from those selling AV, like the Gawd-awful &#8220;the sky is falling&#8221; Intego, and Symantec, none of whose products aren&#8217;t allowed near our Macs.</p>
<p>Might it happen? Certainly. But AV wouldn&#8217;t stop it as AV is always AFTER the fact. It is always behind AV writers and never anticipates. It can only fix or protect from already KNOWN virusses.</p>
<p>So you might as well wait until a virus shows up. So far, that is a very good approach.</p>
<p>Apple is just covering its legal butt.<br />
Tech sites like this should know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/14 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: smokingapples.com @ 2012-02-11 16:29:12 -->
