<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chrome vs Firefox 3.6 vs Safari vs Webkit: Chrome Wins Again!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smokingapples.com/asides/chrome-vs-firefox-3-6-vs-safari-vs-webkit-chrome-wins-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smokingapples.com/asides/chrome-vs-firefox-3-6-vs-safari-vs-webkit-chrome-wins-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:01:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Johnson</title>
		<link>http://smokingapples.com/asides/chrome-vs-firefox-3-6-vs-safari-vs-webkit-chrome-wins-again/#comment-14246</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 22:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smokingapples.com/?p=12686#comment-14246</guid>
		<description>Chrome simply feels much lighter, and seems to be less of a memory hog than FF. I vote for it at http://coolometer.org/chrome-vs-firefox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome simply feels much lighter, and seems to be less of a memory hog than FF. I vote for it at <a href="http://coolometer.org/chrome-vs-firefox" rel="nofollow">http://coolometer.org/chrome-vs-firefox</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 6/14 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: smokingapples.com @ 2012-02-12 00:29:19 -->
